-
Glenn Beck
-
Rebuttal to Glenn Beck on Global Warming: A common problem with media personalities is actually multifaceted. They tend to market to their base and they tend to not understand the science and confuse the issue. This results in a battle of science vs. rhetoric. Glenn Beck is an excellent example and exhibits the problem well. Unfortunately, in the media, he is not alone.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
The Great Global Warming Swindle
-
The Martin Durkin Film, 'The Great Global Warming Swindle', made so many mistakes that after the film was released, the filmmaker was forced to reedit the film. In that process, he removed some of the most blatant mistakes that he had made, but left in some other claims that were also entirely wrong.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
Henrik Svensmark
-
Rebuttal to Svensmark assertions: Svensmark has received a fair amount of attention in the denialist world. But why? He says he is being ignored. But Why? Is it because there is a great conspiracy of scientists trying to hide the truth about galactic cosmic rays? Or is that that Svensmarks conclusions were not supported by the work presented? As it turns out, his conclusions were not sufficiently supported.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
Carolyn Revelle, What My Father Really Said
-
The disturbing story of how scientists that work for special interests can tarnish the reputation of a 'Truly Great Scientist' Roger Revelle. This is a story of distortion that has resonated for years in the global warming debate. The facts and the evidence are clear. Fred Singer, Richard Lindzen, John Coleman and anyone else that supports the deception are guilty of more than deception.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
/
The Revelle Gore Story
-
The Copenhagen Distraction
-
Rebuttal to Bjorn Lomborg on Global Warming: Bjørn Lomborg intentionally or unintentionally obfuscated the political will to mitigate climate change and certainly gained recognition and made money on his assertions. He put together his own conference and called it the Copenhagen Consensus. He wrote a book called 'The Skeptical Environmentalist ' for which the Denmark Ministry of Science found him guilty of 'scientific dishonesty'.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
The Hockey Stick Controversy
-
Many denialists have claimed that the Hockey stick was wrong and they can prove it because a congressional subcommittee said it was wrong. Is there anyone on the planet that doesn't think a congressional subcommittee can be wrong? Nevertheless, here we show, and reference, the facts regarding 'The Hockey Stick' and the argument.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
The Cosmos Myth
-
Did S. Fred Singer trick Revelle into an association to achieve an agenda? When the sequence of events is examined, the intentions seem to implicate his agenda. "The energy companies reportedly began taking steps to prevent the public from believing that humans are warming the planet" ... "as early as the 1980's". It looks like even then, Singer was working with Michaels, Balling, Ellsaesser and Lindzen.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
Station Drop Out
-
Many in the denialist camp like to talk about the fact that many temperature reading stations were taken out, and that is why the temperature readings showed global warming. But in reality, this is "Pure disinformation". According to Gavin Schmidt (NASA/GISS) "You can do the same analysis with only stations that remained and it makes no difference."
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
Global Warming Stopped in 1998
-
Global warming denialists like to say that global warming stopped in 1998. Is it true? No. The warming trend continues. To understand this, one needs to understand that there is a difference between weather and climate. Weather is short term and climate is long term. The long term trend is clear. We are continuing to warm.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
Global Cooling Myth in the 70's
-
Many claim that in the 1970's all scientists believed the earth was cooling. Factual examination of the controversial report reveals that there was a consensus. The consensus was we don't know enough yet. The confirmation of the Milankovitch cycles indicated that we were to begin a cooling phase, the introduction of industrial greenhouse gases indicated we could interrupt the natural cycle. More study was needed.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
